© 2024
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

The end of the NIT

If you watched college basketball last night, you likely had the unfortunate event of seeing Virginia have one of the worst offensive performances since the sport stopped using peach baskets. They lost to Colorado State 67-42 in a game that was not a close as the score might indicate. And perhaps the only people more frustrated than Virginia fans are anyone at Oklahoma, Seton Hall, and Indiana State. Those schools were likely the first three not picked in the field of 68 to play in the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament, where Virginia was definitely one of the last at large teams selected, much to the chagrin of schools with better analytics and resumes and all the other alleged criteria used by the selection committee to choose the field. So when Virginia played like a YMCA rec team after a night of heavy drinking, I’m sure all those on the outside looking in said some profanity laden version of “I told you.” 

What’s perhaps most interesting about Oklahoma, Seton Hall, Indiana State, and a bunch of other teams on the cusp is that they also subsequently chose not to play in the NIT, the second-tier basketball tournament that historically served as a runner-up event, something of a soft landing for players and coaches and also a chance to give your team a bit more practice time, the holy grail for team chemistry. There was a time in fairly distant past where this was actually the most prominent post-season event, but the expansion of the NCAA Tournament and March Madness has relegated the NIT increasingly to something of an afterthought. Which means that for teams like Oklahoma, a Power Five conference team with a massive budget and championship aspirations, putting time and priority into something that won’t be part of One Shining Moment is a losing calculus. Because not playing supposedly would allow more time t help raise money for name, image, and likeness and to recruit students through the wild west of the transfer portal, the architecture of next year’s championship teams. In other words, where coaches once thought that getting in some extra game time was the way to get better, now it seems some coaches think that time could be better spent on things that happen off the court. That is yet another of the seismic shifts in college sports, where the job of being a head coach is in evolutionary flux.

That hasn’t sat well with some in the industry. For example, former Indiana head coach and current ESPN analyst Tom Crean took a shot at coaches who declined an NIT bid, saying that coaches should want to coach and want to give their players a chance to play. And that playing is the best way to get better. That is how a coach would think, that players improve by being coached, and teams improve by playing together. It’s literally what I heard last night in a soccer meeting for incoming high school freshman, a validation for pre-season practices a six-day a week practice schedule. Kids get better by playing more together. And that may be true for your town’s high school. But it won’t save the job of a coach who misses the NCAA Tournament year after year because he didn’t get enough top players to transfer in the offseason or couldn’t find enough endorsement deals to keep his stars from transferring elsewhere.

Which is really what this all comes down to. At some point, big time college coaching is an exercise in self-preservation, if only by necessity. No one stays for long if there isn’t some significant record of success, which for most notable programs means making the NCAA Tournament. Playing in the NIT isn’t going to cut it, and it’s no longer the best way to try and make it there next year like it used to be. Which is why teams like Oklahoma and Seton Hall would rather spend their time more judiciously. It’s also why there’s significant conversations about finally expanding the NCAA Tournament to 76 or 80 teams, making the bubble a bit larger than before and allowing more job security to those on the outside looking in. It also would likely worsen one of the best sports products in the world simply in the name of commerce. Because 68 teams is enough – and for the record, 64 was better. And no matter how many teams you add, there will always be a few teams on the outside looking in.

Of course, they could always play in the NIT. Assuming it’s still around.

Keith Strudler is the director of the School of Communication and Media at Montclair State University. You can follow him at @KeithStrudler

The views expressed by commentators are solely those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views of this station or its management.

Related Content
  • If you talk to University of Florida football fans, a community of which I consider myself a member, they will tell you times have been hard enough the last few years. The Gators haven’t won a bowl game since 2019 and didn’t even play in one last season. All the while we’ve watched SEC foes Georgia and Alabama win national titles and have recent losses to the likes of Kentucky and Vanderbilt, who we always assumed was only in the conference for their SAT scores. And depending on what you believe, it might actually get worse.
  • It’s not unusual to use sports metaphors in politics. Or really in anything. And if you like your politics laden with sports imagery, then you will enjoy the California election to fill Dianne Feinstein’s US Senate Seat. That’s because after last night’s open primary, one of the two final candidates is former major league all-star Steve Garvey, who is best known for his time playing for the LA Dodgers and San Diego Padres.
  • It’s not hard to get hurt playing big time college basketball. There’s on-court collisions, you can get hit, you might trip on something. And that’s just after the game ends. That is, if your game ends with court storming, when fans rush from the stands to the floor after a huge home win. This happens the most after a big upset of a highly ranked team. Like when Wake Forrest upset Duke last weekend, or when UCF surprised Kansas earlier this year. Increasingly, there’s a sense that if you’re a college student and your team is about to pull off a huge, unexpected home win over a Goliath, then it’s nearly a right if not obligation to join the celebration immediately thereafter.