© 2024
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
An update has been released for the Android version of the WAMC App that addresses performance issues. Please check the Google Play Store to download and update to the latest version.

Bill Owens: Flat Wages?

Recent jobs data demonstrates that while employment continues to grow, wages have remained flat. There is speculation about the reasons with many economists offering different, but inconclusive analysis.

Some economist postulate that the failure of wages to increase is the result of rising healthcare costs, although the history before the enactment of the ACA showed ten years of continuing increases in health insurance premiums while wages were, in fact, increasing. There had been claims made by opponents of the ACA that ACA would result in declining employment – clearly not true, - and reduced hours, also not born out by the facts. Other economists speculate that there remain a sufficient number of workers seeking work and being brought back into the workforce, so that you simply have a classic supply and demand situation where supply of labor continues to exceed the demand, and thus, there is no upward pressure on wages. Others speculate that the fact that inflation has been held in check for many years now is also a factor.

I suspect the average worker whose wages have been essentially frozen for several years would not agree that low inflation has been a great benefit to him or her, but rather they have seen the purchasing power of their wages decline. Several months ago I authored a piece when Wal-Mart, Target and several others decided to raise wages. Let me be clear, I do not think that raising the minimum wage to $10 per hour in any way will significantly better the lives of the average worker, nor will it provide a dramatic boost to GDP. Wages have to go much higher than proposed increases in the minimum wage in order for it to have a truly significant impact on individual lives and GDP in general.

The economist Mark Zandi, with Moody’s Economy, said in 2008, “For every dollar spent on that program (food stamps), a $1.73 is generated throughout the economy”. “If someone who is literally living paycheck to paycheck, gets an extra dollar, it is very likely that they will spend that dollar immediately on whatever they need – groceries, to pay the telephone bill, to pay the electric bill”. Corporate cash has grown from slightly under $1.6 trillion dollars at the end of the first quarter of 2007, to nearly $2.1 trillion dollars at the end of the third quarter of 2014. This is displayed in a graph produced by Steven Sluffer of Numberonics of Charleston, South Carolina. He points out that however this cash is used, to purchase technology, to build a new factory, to declare dividends or stock repurchases, putting these cash holdings back into the economy will support GDP growth throughout 2015. This position is supported by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis economic research demonstrating that at the end of Quarter 1 of 2015, there was $1,976,000,000,000 in cash held by corporations in the United States.

These facts form the basis of a proposition that I would proffer calling for the spending of a substantial portion of the nearly $2 trillion dollars in cash held by corporations in the United States for the purpose of boosting GDP by paying it to lower level wage earners, as Dr. Zandi indicates for every dollar you put in the hands of those who live paycheck to paycheck, you increase economic impact by a $1.73, not a bad rate of return. I suspect Wal-Mart and Target raised their salaries for just this reason, as I have remarked before, they are following Henry Ford’s dictum, if you put money in the hands of workers they will spend it on your goods.

It is also fair to point out that there are no effective government policies, federal or state, that provide an incentive for a corporation to spend its cash. We clearly need to develop such policies - not directives - and a bill I introduced in the last Congress would, in my view, do that, as it marries together the interest of workers and owners, so that for every dollar you increase wages, you get a dollar of distributable tax-free dividends.

This article was previously published in The Hill.

Mr. Owens is a former member of Congress representing the New York 23rd, a strategic advisor at Dentons out of its Washington, DC, office, and a partner in the firm of Stafford, Owens, Piller, Murnane, Kelleher & Trombley, PLLC, in Plattsburgh, New York.

The views expressed by commentators are solely those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views of this station or its management.

Related Content