Live VideoLarger View View HD2 Schedule |
Support for WAMC comes from |
3/3/11: Aspartame, better known as Nutrasweet, or AminoSweet, and its new cousin, Neotame, a much larger, much sweeter, and potentially even more toxic update of the Aspartame molecule, are all over the place. Virtually everything you put in your mouth labeled 'sugarless' or 'diet' contains these pernicious, toxic substances. Nutrasweet's original manufacturer was Searle corp. They tried to get Nutrasweet declared safe for consumption, but the body of evidence against it was too strong. In the lab, it caused the following forms of cancer tumors in cellular cultures: brain, pancreatic, breast and uterine. In more recent tests, leukemia, lymphoma and kidney cancers were discovered. If one examines the structure of the Aspartame molecule itself, it's easy to see why it could be so deadly. The molecule mates what is essentially a precursor to wood alcohol, the type of alcohol that causes blindness and seizures, to two amino acids, so that your body readily recognizes it as a nutrient. During digestion, this deadly methanol and also formaldehyde form from these precursor chemicals. I happen to know a researcher who worked in Cornell's neurochemistry program when Searle came calling with their new product. They asked the chairman of the department what percentage of people would be adversely affected by ingesting their new sweetener. When he replied that he thought that 15% could suffer 'irreversible neurological damage', the Searle people actually smiled. 15% was a reasonable number to these people, given that the Cyclamate artificial sweeteners had just been pulled from the market, and there was pressure to do the same with saccharine. There was just too much money to be made to let the health of a few million people get in the way. Since those early studies were not encouraging, (and in fact the FDA was set to rule against them), Searle started paying for their own studies, and to increase their chances of getting to market even more, they hired consummate Washington insider Donald Rumsfeld as CEO. The day after Ronald Reagan's inauguration, the FDA (with the hasty addition of a 6th voting member) abruptly reversed course, and legalized Nutrasweet. Nutrasweet, Neotame and the venerable Monosodium Glutamate are all classified as Excitotoxins, toxic compounds mated to amino acids in such a way that the body sees them as nutrients and absorbs them readily. It's like some kind of diabolical Trojan Horse, ushering in the most potent poisons masquerading as nutrients. Many people know of the MSG headache, or the fuzziness that can accompany a Nutrasweet binge, but are unaware what these warning signs really attest too. They portend potential cellular changes, neurological destruction, endocrine imbalances, and immune system chaos. There is striking evidence that Nutrasweet can also cause or help cause Macular Degeneration, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease (it's been shown to produce pinholes in the brains of rats), Graves Disease, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, and several other neurological and autoimmune conditions, as well as the numerous, aforementioned cancers. Both Searle, and their later parent purchaser, Monsanto, vociferously fought any attempts to get this highly-toxic substance off the market. Their only concern is shareholder equity; Profits, growth and dividends trump any moral qualms. If the FDA really cared about you and I, every cow would be tested for mad Cow disease, factory farms would be forced to deal with their huge waste lagoons, cruelty to animals, and antibiotic and steroid use. Nutrasweet, Neotame, and a host of other dangerous chemicals including trans fats, Olestra, and genetically-modified crops would be illegal. Instead, we have all become unwitting lab rats, with a stew of biochemical experiments and genetically modified substances combining and recombining in completely un-knowable ways in our guts, our bloodstreams, our nerves, and in our brains. There was a hoax on the Internet that Neotame would be allowed, unlabeled, in Organic foods. I'm very relieved to know that this is not true. But beware: Monsanto, and all of the big agribusiness companies are constantly working to weaken the USDA Organic standard to the point that it's as utterly meaningless as the word 'natural' has become on food labels. Rid yourself of these toxins. Grow your own food and get involved with your local organic food growers and purveyors, and petition the federal government to maintain and enhance the integrity of the USDA organic standard, and to return the FDA to its mandate: serving and protecting the people, instead of furthering corporate interests at the people's expense. Samuel Claiborne is a poet, essayist, composer, musician and photographer. A native of New York city, he now makes his home in Rosendale, New York. He also maintains a blog at samuelclaiborne.blogspot.com. 12/14/10: Writing commentaries has turned me into a sort of semi-professional curmudgeon. It's pretty easy too, since the world does indeed appear to be going to hell in a handbasket. Nonetheless, it's getting to be a drag. So, I'm going to try something new today. I'm going to try imagining a better future for America, and, by extension, the world. True, in imagining what could be, I will once more be underscoring how far we are from such lovely dreams. Envisioning a better future can't help but evoke a certain amount of dismay about the present. But I'm going to try anyway, because you cannot get a better future without dreaming of it. The dream, the visualization, is what engenders change. We've seen this over and over again, from Gandhi to Mandela. So: Imagine if the two billion dollars a week America is spending on the war in Afghanistan were being spent to build hospitals here at home. Or schools. Or high speed rail, light rail, bridges, tunnels. Imagine if 10 percent of what America spends on the military was spent on the arts, and another 10 percent on the sciences - what kind of cultural renaissance would we be experiencing right now? Imagine if no one went to sleep hungry in America, or the world. We have enough wealth on this planet right now to give everyone clean food and water. Imagine if there were hundreds of thousands of newly employed workers installing federally subsidized solar panels, wind turbines, insulation, and efficient heating and lighting in your house and mine. Imagine if all American military bases outside the US were shut down; How much fuel we'd be saving; How much money. Imagine if America categorically refused to provide any material aid whatsoever to any brutal regime, regardless of ideology. Imagine if children were taught empathy, comparative religion and literature, critical thinking and non-violent conflict resolution, and real science not creationist claptrap, the world over. No more madrassas of mindless rote memorization, no more ideologically-driven curricula - whether Islamic, Christian, Hindu, or Jewish. No one ever to be taught again that their way of life, their skin color, their tribe, country, ethnic group or religion was superior to any other. Imagine if nothing was ever allowed to become 'too big to fail', again, and every single Wall Street gambler and corporate banking hotshot paid their fair share of their losses. Imagine if corporate CEOs still made on average only 10 times what their workers made in salary. Compared to today's lopsided ratios, that would almost feel egalitarian. Imagine if people thought that paying taxes was patriotic because instead of funding endless wars that bloated the coffers of mega-corporations and politicians, our tax dollars were spent on the best educational and health systems in the world, and on an Apollo-style full-bore attack on the intertwined challenges of energy independence and carbon neutrality. Imagine if carping bullies like Rush Limbaugh, histrionic febrile charlatans like Glenn Beck, sub-intelligent corporate mouthpieces like Sean Hannity and vituperative racist homophobes like Anne Coulter were laughed at whenever they spouted their slanders, absurdities and lies. Imagine if we could all be part of a civil dialogue, one big reality-based conversation among grown ups, with the congenital liars, bullies, and misanthropes all dropped by the wayside, dead ends on our evolutionary tree. Imagine if all racism - black, white, yellow and brown, had withered away and you and I were always judged by the content of our character, not the color of our skin. Imagine if America had some of the lowest teen pregnancy and infant mortality rates in the developed world, and some of the highest literacy rates, instead of the other way around. Imagine if sexuality was seen as a gift from god, instead of something dirty and shameful. Imagine if there were no welfare, because if you were fit to work, society had a job waiting for you, and if you were disabled, your needs were taken care of so you could live comfortably and with dignity. Imagine if America didn't incarcerate almost 25% of all of the prisoners on earth. Imagine that instead of one woman in four on our planet being subjected to sexual or domestic violence, that number was none in 4 billion. Imagine if parents never struck their children, but met their needs and tolerated their inevitable misdeeds with patient, unconditional love. Imagine if it was OK that you believed in one god and I in another, or none at all, that I were straight and you gay. Just Imagine! Samuel Claiborne is a poet, essayist, composer, musician and photographer. A native of New York city, he now makes his home in Rosendale, New York. He also maintains a blog at samuelclaiborne.blogspot.com. 12/7/10: Sunlight is the best disinfectant. It's a cliché, because it's true. The massive trove of hidden data about American foreign policy that has been coming out in bunches from WikiLeaks over the last year is one huge application of disinfectant, a vast searing beam spotlighting American cynicism, malfeasance, murder, manipulation and mayhem, once again demolishing our self-righteous stand as a beacon the world over for justice, liberty, and democracy. America has sold itself so thoroughly on its fictional status as world liberator, both at home and abroad, that it wasn't really until Vietnam, that an appreciable number of Americans and others alike began to really understand that, far from being a force for liberation and the full flowering of human potential, America has more often than not merely been another empire, coldly, calculatingly intent on extracting as much natural and human capital as possible. But despite the pernicious reality, the fantasy America has created in order to inspire young men to be cannon fodder in unjust wars, and in order to justify wholesale theft and murder, is surprisingly robust. One can only hope that these revelations can do damage to the durable fictions we maintain about our country, because maybe then we can truly start to become what we say we are. Since at least the 19th century, we've expanded our sphere of influence, often undermining democratic institutions by means of covert destabilization and outright invasion and attack. Some people believe that this is the natural order of things. Like citizens of empires before them, they believe that their empire is preordained, blessed by God, to practice its cruel hegemony. Others are in denial; they swallow the treacle that is most American history whole, believing that all of our wars have been about freedom and democracy. They refuse to acknowledge that America has taught jihadists how to build bombs and shoot down civilian airliners, and itself assassinated democratically elected leaders, practiced torture and wholesale slaughter. Their rejection of the facts is absolute: By definition, America can do no wrong. And then there are those of us in the middle. Like the former, we see America for what she is - an often brutal, aggressive empire, but we reject the characterization of this behavior as anything other than evil. Like the latter, we're still inspired by the founding documents of America, the fiery speeches of Tom Paine, the witty, hypocrisy-piercing acumen of Ben Franklin, Jefferson's stirring aspirations - but we no longer believe them. As I'm writing this, the US government is in full damage control mode as the unprecedented diplomatic meltdown created by the WikiLeaks revelations metastasizes and reverberates around the world. While I am neither distressed nor particularly pleased about these embarrassments, I do think that their release into the light of day does more good than harm because I think that hypocrisy revealed is almost always a good thing. However, it's the things in the cracks that I find so deeply painful. For example, if these cables are to be believed, our Pentagon specifically and purposely targeted refugee camps in Yemen for missile attacks. This revelation harkens back to the earlier release from WikiLeaks a few months ago that revealed our conduct of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars to be replete with the same kind of cynical callous brutality. I want to believe that America is a force for good in the world, but when we purposely rain bombs down on innocent men, women and children to fulfill some arcane geopolitical goal, or merely to maintain a huge empire that gorges on the world's bounty, I can't. My dream of America spirals off of the gritty surface of the reality of our foreign policy like sunlit frost sublimes into vapor. One minute it's there, an apparently hard truth, the next, it's gone, rising skyward like a vagrant dream, and once again I am left with the sad fact that my country is not the soaring force of Justice, democracy and decency I was taught it was. My only hope is that if enough sunlight is poured onto America's behavior, and motives, she will finally recoil in horror at what she has become, stanch the infection of empire, and grow toward the dream of herself that she holds so dear. Samuel Claiborne is a poet, essayist, composer, musician and photographer. A native of New York city, he now makes his home in Rosendale, New York. He also maintains a blog at samuelclaiborne.blogspot.com. 2/15/10: The liberals back east Big government is the new boogieman. Or should I say the old one. Ronald Reagan famously said that government is the problem, and this simplistic statement has found resonance with generations of conservatives, from the greedy elites, who adore the fallacies of trickle-down economics, to the angry populists of the tea party movement. When it comes to the tea partiers, their new-found hysteria over deficits underscores how well they've been manipulated by the likes of Beck and Hannity, because during Bush's 8 years, while deficit spending soared, not least because of unprecedented tax breaks for the super rich that yielded little for the middle class, the tea partiers, the pundits, and the Republican congressmen and senators who now loudly decry Obama's deficit spending were all curiously silent. In fact, those elected officials were actually complicit, voting for drug bills, increased privatization, boondoggle arms procurements, no bid contracts, tax breaks, and, of course, ill-fated military adventures, all of which cost every tax payer dearly. Now they shed crocodile tears and have become born-again fiscal conservatives. And the average Joe on the street has likewise once again caught the fever of fiscal conservatism; Except when it comes to his tax breaks; Or our obscene and ultimately untenable military budget; Or the two wars that are costing more than all of the fiscal stimulus plans put together. What's more, that same man on the street, who somehow feels that taxes are an unnecessary burden, expects the National Guard to save his house from floods, the forest service to protect his home from wildfires, the military to protect him from foreign aggression and domestic insurrection; Somehow. Even more of a disconnect becomes apparent when you study the demographics of these fiscal conservatives. They dominate the red states that voted for Bush Cheney, and also for McCain Palin. But most of the red states are fiscal leaches, net beneficiaries of federal funding to states. In fact, some 76% of the states that voted for Bush in 2000 are pigs at the federal trough, taking far more than their fair share. Some of the worst offenders include that fiercely independent state, North Dakota, which gets over 2 dollars back from evil big government for every dollar it puts in. Mississippi, which nets $1.84, and of course, when you include their unshared oil revenues, America's biggest socialist experiment and welfare state, Alaska. And the biggest losers? Places like New York, Massachusetts, and California. Those miserable liberals who want to waste people's hard-earned tax dollars are wasting them on… subsidizing born-again populists who keep whining about the bloated federal government while they feast on its largesse. It's so ironic as to be laughable, but I'm not laughing. At a tea party meetup the other day, a speaker accused the federal government of 'stealing our hard-earned tax dollars to send to those liberals back east' – an almost complete inversion of the facts. But let's not confuse these folks with the truth. The fact is that almost all of the Bush tax cut money went to the super-rich. A stunning 1.8 trillion dollars, a sum that exceeds even the health care bill. That, plus his reckless war in Iraq has cost the American taxpayer far, far more than any Democratic president in modern history, but that's another inconvenient truth. Ironically, what damaged Bush's reputation the most was not his profligate spending and mad cowboy disease warmongering. What really turned the American people against him was the failure of big government after Katrina. People were rightly incensed that the most powerful country in the world seemed completely helpless and useless. Some even blamed big government for this, pointing out that Wal Mart and other non-governmental organizations provided speedier, more efficient aid. But they missed the larger point: the capable James Lee Witt, director of FEMA during the Clinton administration, was sacked by Bush and replaced with the clueless, do nothing, fiddle-while-Rome-burns ,'Brownie', Michael Brown. Under Bush, FEMA's budget was slashed, and it once again became a dumping ground for political appointees, hacks like Brown who were owed favors. It wasn't big government by its nature that failed the residents of the Gulf coast, but rather the hollowing out of big government, which has been destroyed by privatization, budget cuts, and cronyism. If the tea partiers really want to put their money where their mouth is, they should start sending our government the money they're stealing from the liberals back East. Samuel Claiborne is a poet, essayist, composer, musician and photographer. A native of New York city, he now makes his home in Rosendale, New York. He also maintains a blog at samuelclaiborne.blogspot.com. 1/06/10: Am I a Commie or A capitalist? My car is festooned with bumper stickers. Some favorites include "Abstinence Makes the Church Grow Fondlers", "Alternative Energy is Homeland Security" and "These Colors Don't Run… the World". This last one in particular seems to provoke the ire of right wingers. Recently I picked up a new deer rifle at a local sporting goods store. As I returned to my car, I found a note on the windshield that said "Expletive you and your Expletive Commie Bumper Stickers". It also had a rather fetching smiley face drawn at the bottom as a lovely coda. Sure, 'Commie' is one of those all-purpose epithets that has essentially lost all meaning to most who wield it, but since I'd just seen Michael Moore's film about Capitalism, I began to wonder, am I a Commie? With apologies to Michael Moore, I think I'm actually a bit of a Capitalist. Certainly, I do not believe in an equal share of wealth for everyone. For example, I do not believe that a lazy person deserves my standard of living. I also believe that this thing called the 'profit motive' which Moore seems to find distasteful, obviously works. One has only to look at China and Russia: when their collective farms were given the opportunity to sell some of their harvest on the open market and keep the profit, giving them a direct incentive to work harder, their production soared. This is human nature. In fact, when you take studies of such diverse animals as chimps and macaws into account, one might even make a case that it's a near universal natural law of social economy, replete with ancillary laws such as 'you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours'. I believe in a meritocracy. You work hard, you contribute; you live better. You're lazy, shirk your duty, you live worse. And I believe in private property. I'm hardly a 'Commie'. But that doesn't mean I believe in the greedy, self-destructive form of Capitalism we have today. Our current system is like a snake eating its own tail. It is so obsessed with short-term profit that it is actively consuming itself. The environment is despoiled for short term gain. Dishonesty and poor workmanship are rewarded for those well-connected. And most alarming, human capital – the experience and skills of innumerable workers, is squandered and often thrown away like scrap iron. And, because the true cost some commodities, like coal and nuclear power, are not rolled into their market value, they remain artificially cheap when compared to more environmentally benign technologies like solar and wind. The system is rigged. It's not a free-market at all. It's not true capitalism. It is, indeed, a bit closer to the tenets of fascism, which might be paraphrased a bit like 'what's good for business is good for America'. That, assumes, of course, that this thing we call business, has America's best interests at heart. It doesn't. Corporations are soul-less creations with no morality and only one imperative: make a profit at all costs. If a human were so constructed, he'd be called a dangerous psychopath. Instead of free market Capitalism, we have the worst of both worlds: a largely unregulated economic system that rewards greed, human degradation and environmental destruction, and a nice safe back-door policy that has made sure, since at least the 1880's, that the truly huge players are protected from their own recklessness. The irony is that if we lived in an actual laissez faire Capitalist system, while many things would be worse, there would also be no bailouts, no 'too big to fail'. Halliburton would go broke because their shoddy construction that electrocutes troops and their vastly overpriced consulting fees would fail in a truly free market. No bid government contracts would cease to exist. Large banks and brokerage houses that took daredevil risks with their investments would go bust, probably triggering a vast meltdown as their underwriters, like Goldman Sacks, also failed. In a true 'free market', who you know, and who you contributed campaign dollars and other forms of bribery to, wouldn't matter; which is, of course, why the idea of a true 'free market economy' is a total fiction. We are chattel, bought and paid for by transnational corporations just like coal or soybeans. There's nothing 'free' about it. Samuel Claiborne is a poet, essayist, composer, musician and photographer. A native of New York city, he now makes his home in Rosendale, New York. He also maintains a blog at samuelclaiborne.blogspot.com. 12/11/09: Obama Sells Out Shortly after Obama was inaugurated, I wrote a commentary that was quite critical of his economic team, which was composed of the very people who had created the financial crisis in the first place. I ended the commentary by suggesting that the age of Obama was starting to sound more like 'meet the new boss, same as the old boss' than 'a change is gonna come'. But disillusioned as I'd become about his domestic agenda, I still hoped that Obama would shine on foreign policy – that he might truly turn the ungainly ship of Empire around and return it to port. After all, it's quite clear that America is following a long line of Imperial mistakes before it, vitiating itself with ever more military adventures, while provoking the ire of subjugated peoples, who are increasingly fighting back, weakening America like Lilliputians tying down Gulliver. But here, again, Obama has either caved to his corporate masters, or is showing his own true colors. He hasn't extracted us from either of the costly wars we're mired in; he's escalated our involvement, apparently heeding the specious advice to 'listen to the commanders on the ground'. Those commanders not surprisingly say what such men have always said, everywhere, throughout history: give us more men and arms and we'll get the job done. Because their only tool is the hammer of military might, they perceive everything as a nail that must be struck repeatedly. Obama's taken the Bush position that suspects can be held indefinitely without trial at our new Guantanamo, Bagram Air Force base. His administration has decided to continue the Bush policy of rendition, wherein suspects are picked up the world over and sent to 'friendly regimes' for questioning. The administration reassured the public that this policy would be closely monitored to prevent 'prisoner abuse'. The entire purpose of rendition is to move a suspect to a country that has more brutal interrogation methods than our own! It's extra-legal government-executed kidnapping that completely undermines American verbiage about 'respecting the rule of law'. Then Obama refused to do anything more than lightly slap Israel's wrist when that country once again threw gasoline on the fire by confiscating more land, tearing down more Palestinian housing, and going on a spree of new settlement building. The Palestinians have wisely refused to negotiate with Israel until this madness stops, but Obama is offering no carrot, and more importantly no stick, to compel the Israelis. Even George Bush senior was tougher on them, once suggesting that he would cease supporting loan guarantees for Israel if they didn't stop building. President Obama is going to Copenhagen for climate talks, it's true, and on the environment he is clearly a better president than either Bush was, but it's still too little, too late. The massive public-works projects in renewable energy that this administration could have spent the stimulus money on have been largely swapped for bureaucratic expansion and conventional highway construction. His approach is more fiddling while Rome burns, than 'change we can believe in'. White house visitor logs show that our president is eschewing meetings with progressive voices on health coverage, the economy, the environment, and economic justice, meeting instead with corporate interests and their lobbyists on these very subjects. Sound familiar? Mr. Obama topped it all. Our newly-minted Nobel Prize winner's administration stated that the United States has decided to maintain the Bush administration's refusal to sign an international treaty banning land mines. But that makes sense: not only does America spend more on defense-related matters than all other countries on earth combined, but it's also the biggest arms dealer, the biggest supplier of weapons of destruction, both mass and individual, on our planet as well. Frankly, I'm disgusted. Far from being instruments of seismic change, Obama's policies support the status quo with an almost slavish fealty. I can't for the life of me understand the hysterical comparisons of Obama to Stalin and Hitler on the right. These must be engendered by racism, pure and simple, because far from being on the radical fringe, Mr. Obama appears to be a middle of the road, bought-and-paid-for tool of corporate America, offering us a sort of 'Bush Light' foreign and domestic policy. At the end of the day, the man who wrote the brilliant, touching and humane 'Dreams from my father', and promised us sweeping change, has sold out himself, and all those who believed in him. But it's our fault; for once again we wanted, needed to believe that this country could change, even though all of its institutions, from the legislative, executive and judicial branches to its 'free' press, are now basically appendages of multi-national corporations. Samuel Claiborne is a poet, essayist, composer, musician and photographer. A native of New York city, he now makes his home in Rosendale, New York. He also maintains a blog at samuelclaiborne.blogspot.com. 9/16/09: In recent months, The psychotic sophistries of right wing pundits have gone gonzo. It's as if losing the election has blown their minds. First, there was Sean Hannity's 'tree of liberty'. I defy any sane adult to not fall down laughing after viewing it. Mr. Hannity shows us an old-timey illustration of the tree of liberty, complete with roots named Liberty, Freedom, etc, combining into a strong trunk. Above this trunk there are apples, named commerce, security etc. Then Mr. Hannity tells us that since Obama has become president, all of these apples have fallen into, I kid you not, the 'apple crate of socialism'. This entire cartoon seems to be for two year olds, but it's not, it's for the supposedly adult viewers of his program. Do his viewers never stop to think that by Hannity's definition, government-run institutions like fire, police, and military forces, and even public schools and hospitals, are equally 'socialist'. Later in the week, he tried to stir public ire over the fact that President Obama ordered a hamburger with Dijon mustard on it. Oh dear, how elitist! It's shocking that the president might want an exotic condiment like grey poupon mustard instead of Heinz ketchup. No, wait a minute, if he'd ordered Heinz, he'd be funding Theresa Heinz Kerry's evil radical agenda. I'm sure that was on tap as the diligent Hannity production team parsed Mr. Obama's menu choices. Rush Limbaugh accused the president of coddling the Somalis who'd taken an American sea captain hostage. He called them 'black Muslim teenagers', the implication being: hey, Obama's black, and maybe he's Muslim too. Yes, and maybe on weekends President Obama secretly goes swashbuckling in the gulf of Aden with distant dangerous relatives from the Dark Continent. Scary! Of course, once those pirates were dispassionately killed by Navy Seal snipers and the hostage freed, Limbaugh changed his tune - he then criticized the president's 'slow response'. Now Limbaugh has topped it all by suggesting that Governor Mark Sanford's affair was caused by his extreme distress at having to accept Obama's stimulus package money. OK, let's forget for a moment that Sanford's been having an affair for over a year, i.e. since before Obama was president. Are we really supposed to believe that a prominent Republican, who was until his recent self immolation thought to be a presidential contender, is so weak that he would break his marriage vows under the duress of… performing his executive duties? Is this the supposedly macho Republican Party we're talking about here, or a bunch of those famously weak wristed liberals? OK, I know that this president can do no right as far as these folks are concerned. Their job is to throw raw meat to mouth-breathing australopithecines (I wouldn't insult the intelligence of Neanderthals by calling them that), but surely even these intellectually challenged listeners must at some point find this nitpicking, absurdist bloviating to be too much. It defies logic that an adult, who knows the rudiments of personal hygiene, can tie their shoes, read and write, and drive a car, can take any of this seriously. And this is what I find so distressing about these supposed pundits, and many more from Michael Weiner AKA 'Michael Savage' to the joyously malevolent Ann Coulter. It's not that they exist, not even that some media executive might want to put them on the air because their extremist views are consonant with his own. No, it's that these people have massive, massive audiences. Who are these millions upon millions of people who follow the pundits, no matter how absurd their rationales, or egregious their hypocrisies. Rush Limbaugh railed against drug addicts for years, yet he was caught with an astounding 30,000 Oxycontin pills. Anyone other than a celebrity of his magnitude would have gone away for a long, long time for possession with intent to distribute. But Rush kept his job. The question is, how did he keep his listeners? How could these people still respect the world's greatest hypocrite? And how is America to prosper when so many Americans are this credulous, and this easily manipulated, whether into nonsensical 'tea party' protests or murderous attacks on doctors? Samuel Claiborne is a poet, essayist, composer, musician and photographer. A native of New York city, he now makes his home in Rosendale, New York. He also maintains a blog at samuelclaiborne.blogspot.com. 9/11/09: The Lockerbie bomber The DJ on my car radio was incensed. The Lockerbie bomber had been released. My first thoughts echoed his: it was indecent that this killer was not only released, but received a hero's welcome back home in Libya. Yes, I admit it; I'm just not that forgiving a guy. I don't think a terminally-ill convicted killer should be released on compassionate grounds so that he might spend his last days with friends and family. If he truly is guilty, he deserves to spend his last days, his last breath, rotting in jail. But other thoughts arose as well. One was that many of the Lockerbie victim's families doubted his guilt. Jim Swire, whose daughter Flora was killed, said: "I went into that court in Holland thinking I was going to see the trial of those who were responsible for the murder of my daughter. I came out of it thinking he had been framed." A bereaved father's statement of support for the alleged killer of his child carries a lot of weight with me, as do those of the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission, which termed the conviction a possible miscarriage of justice. Where was the media coverage of these nuances? Surely they may even have played a part in his release, yet I heard nothing about them on CNN, ABC, NPR. My next thought was even more troubling, and it brought me back to the outrage of the DJ, and to my own reflexive anger. How, I thought, can we all feel such outrage when the United States has been harboring a serial terrorist bomber for years? Louis Posada Carilles is largely thought to be responsible for the bombing of a Cuban airliner that killed all aboard, including the mostly teenage members of the Cuban National Fencing Team. He has been convicted in abstentia in several countries for bombings and bombing plots, and was thought by our own FBI to have been involved in literally hundreds of bombings of Cuban targets in Cuba, Honduras, Panama and Venezuela. Washington even denied an extradition request from the Venezuelan Supreme Court, and Carilles continues to live in the United States though he has actually admitted to several bombings. He said of one bombing in Cuba, that killed an Italian-Canadian national: "It is sad someone is dead, but we cannot stop." He also worked for Colonel Oliver North and General Richard Secord as they secretly and illegally armed Contra death squads in Nicaragua. Of course, North, a man who did everything he could to subvert our constitution by doing an end run around our laws and our congress, is now a well paid radio and TV personality and a darling 'patriot' of the right. It seems that no bad deed goes unrewarded for these murderous thugs, and the airwaves are strangely mute about their crimes and our government's continuing complicity. George Bush senior once said these telling words: "One man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist" – and there, in one sentence, is all you need to know about the moral expediency of the United States. We will protect a bloodthirsty killer involved in literally scores of bombings of civilian targets because he is the enemy of our enemy. And while protecting him, we will respond with self-righteous outrage when another bomber, whose guilt is far less established, is set free. How sad that the frothing right, and even the average American citizen has forgotten the wisdom of Thomas Paine, one of the pivotal figures of the American revolution, who said "He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression.". The American policy of covert wars against countries we do not like, wars that often kill innocent civilians, is immoral and reprehensible. America has no solid moral footing, and seems unlikely to develop one when the Obama administration is enthusiastically continuing Bush polices of rendition and holding people without trial at a sort of Guantanimo lite – the Bagram air force base. Our government, our media, and most of our political commentators, appear to be rank hypocrites as they protest torture, terrorism and oppression in places like Libya and Iran while they refuse to acknowledge, or sometimes even actively cover up, their own country's equivalent crimes. Samuel Claiborne is a poet, essayist, composer, musician and photographer. A native of New York city, he now makes his home in Rosendale, New York. He also maintains a blog at samuelclaiborne.blogspot.com. 8/20/09: Country Gone Mad Suddenly, the tea parties are old news. The freak-out de jour is healthcare, and people are so profoundly ignorant about the issue that one woman begged the President not to let the government take over Medicare. 'Scuse me mam, but just who do you think administers Medicare, the tooth fairy? This is, of course, not the organically-grown 'grassroots' movement the conservative commentators are crowing as a fine example of democracy. It's funded by special interests, and carried to the people on multitudes of conservative talkshows. And these fine examples of democracy are in fact screaming, shouting people down, and threatening God's retribution. They resemble a feral mob of brown shirts from Hitler's Germany, not concerned citizens looking for dialogue and compromise. The Right isn't interested in dialogue; they're interested in winning at all costs, even if the cost is the end of the grand democratic experiment that is America. I think we're approaching the greatest threat to our democracy since at least the Great Depression. Day by day, my hopes for a post-racial America, and an America that really stands for liberty and justice are crumbling under an onslaught of disgusting, thinly-veiled racist vitriol and lynch mob mentality. We've had people with assault rifles coming to our president's speeches. One man, with a pistol strapped to his leg carried a sign saying 'It's time to water the tree of liberty'. When questioned by the media, he played dumb - oh no, I'm not advocating violence. There was no reference to blood on my sign. Of course, his sign implicitly references bloodshed, since the famous Jefferson quote it paraphrases is: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants." This quote, a former favorite of mine, was sullied forever by Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. His favorite tee shirt was emblazoned with it. Apparently Mr. McVeigh convinced himself that the women and children he blew up were either patriots or tyrants, rather than victims of a sick, twisted little man. A nascent threat to the president is evident at every speaking engagement, along with a veritable flood of racial caricature. We've had a seemingly endless parade of Republican party figures outed for emailing or mailing unbelievably racist caricatures of our president, from Obama in a witch doctor's outfit, to the white house garden filled with watermelon. A Boston cop email blasted out a letter comparing professor Louis Gates to a "banana-eating jungle monkey'. His lawyer said the comments were "taken out of context" - how in God's name can you take something like that out of context? We've had two Fox News personalities inadvertently voicing their innermost thoughts this way: Brian Kilmeade said "we [Americans] keep marrying other species and other ethnicities . . . Swedes have pure genes . . . in America we marry everybody..." Glenn Beck said: "Obama is a racist who has a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture." I'm not sure what white culture is. Is it personified by the transcontinental railroad, built largely with the toil and blood of Chinese immigrants? Or theAmerican cowboy, who was very often black? Or perhaps our constitution, large parts of which were lifted from the Iroquois? The fantasy that white people alone made this great country persists in the minds of these troglodytes, all evidence to the contrary notwithstanding. Many whites still look back to the 1950's as a golden time. Funny, I see it as a time of shame, when large parts of America practiced apartheid and lynching, and people were blacklisted for their beliefs. It was a time of paranoia, censorship, and lockstep conformity - none of which are the hallmarks of a great democracy. So how do we defend our democracy? Surely joining the shouting match isn't the way. I don't want to be a bully, but I don't want to sit idly by while my country is highjacked by a bunch of crazy, ignorant racists either. Well, money talks, and Glenn Beck's show has lost a slew of advertisers who felt he went too far - but not until they received tons of mail from outraged Americans. Perhaps a boycott of every Fox advertiser is a start. If you've got a better idea, I'm all ears. Samuel Claiborne is a poet, essayist, composer, musician and photographer. A native of New York city, he now makes his home in Rosendale, New York. He also maintains a blog at samuelclaiborne.blogspot.com. 7/7/09: Who is the Pharoah? An Israeli government official recently likened the Obama administration's call for a complete cessation of any new settlement activity in the occupied territories, to a pharaonic decree to cast newborn sons into the river. What an arrogant, twisted and spiteful piece of verbal mischief. The idea is that Israel must expand, and that limiting the so-called 'natural growth' of the settlements is in effect, inhibiting Jewish birthrates. I guess by this logic, the Palestinians, who have a much higher birth-rate than Israel's, should eventually be given her territory, as their numbers swell. Of course this bit of sophistry is laughable, but it plays on deeply-held religious convictions, and so it plays with fire. A little sunlight on the subject: The pharaohs taxed the Jews, and enslaved them. The United States government, under every administration since the 1940's, has subsidized the Jewish state. We are hardly some cold ruler lording it over our subjects. We're more like an angry parent, finally telling our kid that if he doesn't stop bullying the entire neighborhood, we're going to cut his allowance and ground him. Or rather, that's what I wish we were saying. The Jewish state can continue its insane and inflammatory policy of grabbing more and more of other people's land. It can continue to throw gasoline and thermite on the flames. I'm not advocating that we force Israel through military action to comply. But just as Israel is free to pursue a course of action that is not only suicidal, but holds great risks for America, the United States should feel free to politely decline any more military and economic aid to Israel. I for one am sick of the tail wagging the dog. It is our largesse, our good will that has kept the state of Israel alive. In return, she has spied on us on several occasions, and resolutely refuses to moderate her behavior. This is not a relationship of give and take. There is no reciprocal compromise. In fact, I'd say that it's Israel that resembles a haughty pharaoh, not the Obama administration. Israel's intransigence, it's theft of land and huge quantities of water from indigenous Palestinians, threatens world stability. It's arguable that neither 9-11, or the attacks on the USS Cole and our embassies in Africa would have occurred if we hadn't given Israel carte blanche all these years. If she wants to go her own way, unheeding of the consequences, I see no reason why we should feel required to pick up the tab. Israel needs boundaries. She needs be told, no, we will not stand by while you make things worse, subjugating a people, forcing them into little Bantustans, throwing their human rights in the toilet. We will not give you the money or the armaments to burn civilians with white phosphorus, scatter brightly-colored cluster bombs that look like plastic toys into densely populated neighborhoods, nor have your infantry make sport of shooting unarmed civilians. America does not fund Hamas. Consequently we don't have much sway with them. Much as I'd love to see Hamas and Hezzbolah destroyed, I feel less responsible for the evils they commit because my tax dollars aren't funding them, as they are funding Israel's. If you ever needed proof that lobbyists, rather than the will of the people control policy, one has only to look at the contrast between the stated policy goals of the pro-Israeli lobby groups, and the results of polls of American Jewry. American Jews are far more critical of Israel's policies, far more likely to want the US government to attach strings to our aid to Israel, and far more likely to support a free and contiguous Palestinian state right now. Politicians are listening to the lobbyists, not the people, on all issues, and it's time, on the issues of Israel, American foreign policy, American domestic policy, the environment, and our insane military budget, for the people to make some noise and take back their country. And it's time for the state of Israel to show some respect, flexibility and humility towards their best friend in the world, and stop whining like an eternal victim. Bullies don't make good victims. Samuel Claiborne is a poet, essayist, composer, musician and photographer. A native of New York city, he now makes his home in Rosendale, New York. He also maintains a blog at samuelclaiborne.blogspot.com. |
Midday Magazine The Roundtable Vox Pop The Legislative Gazette The Media Project The Capitol Connection Northeast Report |
Commentators WAMC Conversation WAMC Blog WAMC Speakers Corner NPR BBC Marketplace PRI |
 |
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr